What is the value of camping ministry? Mainline
denominations continue their contraction and “restructuring.” Many
congregations are thriving, but there are many more that are struggling. The
struggle extends to affiliated ministries and entire denominational bodies, and
church organizations at every level are facing difficult decisions about the
future. When it comes down to dollars and cents, boards, presbyteries,
councils, and conferences find themselves deciding what they value most. Tears
are shed and hearts are broken over lost staff positions and ministries that
lose funding. The camping world is certainly feeling the strain.
Some camps are like Camp Indian Sands, a Lutheran camp in
Wisconsin that is quietly closing its ministry after years of struggling with
decreased revenue and camper numbers. Other camps are being liquidated to pay
down the debt of struggling denominational bodies. Such was the fate of
Presbyterian Camps in Michigan, a camping ministry site that was in continuous
operation since 1899. Still other camps are closed at the whim of church
leaders and officials who choose to focus time and resources on ministries that
are more highly valued. Such was the case in the Missouri Conference of the
United Methodist Church, which chose to simultaneously close all four of its
camping ministry sites. The American Baptist Church seems to be almost entirely
divesting from camping ministry, closing nearly 2/3 of its 150 camps in the
past 20 years.
Camp directors and other camp advocates struggle to tell the
powerful stories of their camp and make the case for the value of their
ministries. They bop around to congregations and donors, finding that they have
to explain why their ministries are important. Essentially, camp directors are
forced to sell the idea of camp to ministry partners. The justification of camp
has to be reduced to marketing slogans or the proverbial elevator speech (here
I am, reducing it to a blog post!). When camp directors are forced to do this
over and over again just to keep their ministry afloat, ministry partners may
get tired of the rhetoric, as if camp directors are just some carnies trying to
sell them overpriced experiences of dubious quality.
Some people just don’t get it, and increasingly these people
are clergy members and church leaders who have never been to camp. Maybe they
see camp as “theologically shallow” or “just fun and games.” Maybe they think
that the emotional experience at camp “ruins kids for the church.” I have heard
all of these things multiple times, oftentimes phrased the same way as if
people are reading from a script. What it comes down to is a lack of
understanding the value of camping ministry. Camp directors struggle to get the
message across, but pastors may not trust them or see them as ministry
partners. Camp leaders promoting camp primarily as a “mountaintop experience”
or a “life-changing experience” may not be helping. Somewhere, the message gets
garbled, and people who should be our primary ministry partners just hear an
excitable carny promising, “It’ll be the ride of your life! Step right up!”
while some poor kid who just exited the ride is throwing up in the trash can.
How did our churches and denominational bodies get to a
place where such a vital discipleship ministry has been devalued and increasingly
relegated to the trash heap?
Churches and denominational bodies that bemoan the
alienation of young adults often fail to consider the many thousands of young
adults living in intentional Christian community for months at a time while
mentoring children at denominational camps across the country. Those who are
panicking over the loss of Mainline young people to the ranks of the
religiously unaffiliated (our lovable “nones”) evidently do not know that young
people who have attended religious camp are over 3 times more likely to remain
religiously affiliated into their young adult years than their peers who did
not attend camp.[1]
Some kids may have a “mountaintop” encounter with God at
camp, but this is no carnival ride. This affects young people long-term as they
continue engaging in church and Christian small groups years later.[2]
Some become public Christian leaders and clergy members, but it is misleading
to think of camps as pastor factories, even if many of our clergy members have
experienced camp or received their call to ministry there. Camps are much more
than pastor factories.
Camps are centers of
discipleship. They are indispensible because of their uniqueness in
providing intentional Christian community, a chance for young people to take
ownership of their faith, and space for people to live and breathe the faith as
active disciples rather than passive recipients. They are not stand-alone
ministries, and some of our camp directors may need to be reminded of this.
Camps are ministry partners with families, congregations, and communities that
make tremendous contributions to faith formation and Christian education in
people of all ages. Somewhere, this message has gotten garbled and resulted in
a devaluing of a vital ministry.
These vital ministries serve hundreds of thousands of young
people at our denominational camps each summer, reaching over half of all
Mainline Protestants by their teenage years.[3] Some
have life-changing mountaintop experiences, and a small portion have horrible
experiences (perhaps including retching into trash cans). The vast majority
falls at neither extreme but rather has a special experience of Christian
community and living that is incorporated (consciously or unconsciously) into
their understanding of who they are in relation to God. And these are only the
summer campers! Our camps also offer enriching family camp ministries to
thousands of families, often connecting multiple generations in faith forming
community in the outdoors. They offer retreat ministries to hundreds of
thousands of families, youth, adults, and clergy members who need a chance to
“come away to a quiet place and rest a while” in the presence of God, creation,
and one another. Camps reach out to the unchurched and the underprivileged in
multiple ways. Camps are oftentimes more recognizable as the Church than many
of our denominational congregations!
Why are we being forced to justify this idea to our ministry
partners? Times are tough. Ministries are shutting down. But camping ministries
are not the ones to devalue. These are ministries with the power to revitalize
and renew the church, and our congregations can learn a great deal about
Christian community and discipleship from our camps. Maybe some day soon our
camp professionals can spend less time on the elevator speeches and more on
their role as Christian educators. It will take partnership and recognizing
ourselves as members of the body of Christ, in which each member is
indispensible.
It will take a recognition that camp is not about cheap
thrills and expensive rides. It is about discipleship.
[1]
Jacob Sorenson, “The Summer Camp Experience and Faith Formation of Emerging
Adults,” The Journal of Youth Ministry
13 (2014), 17-40.
[2]
American Camp Association, “Directions: Youth Development Outcomes of the Camp
Experience,” http://www.acacamps.org;
Sorenson; Kati Niemelä, Does Confirmation Training Really Matter? A
Longitudinal Study of the Quality and Effectiveness of Confirmation Training in
Finland. Tampere: Church Research Institute, 2008.
[3]
Christian Smith, Soul Searching: The
Religious and Spiritual Live of American Teenagers. (Oxford: University
Press, 2005), 39.
You wrote that "young people who have attended religious camp are over 3 times more likely to remain religiously affiliated into their young adult years than their peers who did not attend camp" and referenced an article where it appeared. Is there a place online to see that article or the research that is behind it? Thanks.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment, Matt. That article is in the current issue of The Journal of Youth Ministry, so it is not yet available online. This is an academic, peer-reviewed publication. It should be available through most theological libraries, and it will soon be available on the ATLA religion database.
ReplyDeleteThe research presented in the article is based on the National Study of Youth and Religion, and it looks at the young people who indicated that they attended camp at wave 1 (2003) five years later (2008).
ReplyDelete